Healthcare is shifting from its long-standing model of simply billable fees-for-service to a more patient-centered model known as value-based care. This encourages an emphasis on patients but potentially leads to reduced cost and better care. In this blog, we will discuss what value-based care is, the importance of moving from a volume to a value model, how the VBC model differs from the fee-for-service model, key principles of value-based care, and the various existing value-based purchasing programs.
Value-based care, in a broader perspective represents a delivery model within the healthcare sector centered on high-quality and efficient as well as patient-centered care. Under VBC, payment is "rewarded" to providers based on better outcomes for patients rather than through fee-for-service, wherein providers are actually paid based on the qualityof services they can offer.
In addition, for example, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in 2024 increase value-based programs with new ACO models asking providers to give significant importance to outcome-based metrics rather than the volume of services.
The new figures revealed by the Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network (HCP LAN) 2024 report reflect that more than 60 percent of payments in the sector are now attributed to value-based models, mainly under Medicare Advantage.
Let’s take an example, John visits his physician multiple times for a persistent headache issue. His insurance claim summary shows that the provider was reimbursed for every service provided during each visit.
On the contrary, Peter, John’s friend, visits a different provider. However, his claims show that the provider was reimbursed on a one-time lump sum basis, based on how well the provider managed his condition on quality metrics.
In John's scenario, the provider delivered volume (of services) with little or no strings attached to quality. But Peter's provider aimed to deliver value with the best care possible to meet quality metrics and this helped Peter get improved and proper care. The introduction of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, has made provider organizations focus and shift from volume to value.
Today's State of Value-Based Care
Fig 1: The Current State of Value-Based Care (VBC)
While fee-for-service focuses on the number of services rendered, VBC is centered on the quality of care provided. According to the latest 2024 CMS guidelines, providers participating in shared savings programs and advanced APMs (Alternative Payment Models) are incentivized to reduce costs while improving patient outcomes. So, it is necessary to understand how value-based care vs fee-for-service battle goes on paper to implementation.
A few ways value-based payments differ from FFS:
What are the Key Principles of Value-Based Care?
What are the Different Value-Based Payment Models?
All value-based reimbursement arrangements emphasize quality over the quantity of services provided. The terms ‘value-based care’ or ‘value-based payment’ include a variety of reimbursement arrangements, including APMs (Alternative Payment Models), advanced APMs, bundled payments for episodes of care, pay-for-performance, shared savings programs, and global capitated payments.
Pay for Performance | Healthcare providers are only compensated if they meet certain metrics for quality and efficiency. |
APMs and Advanced APMs | APMs can apply to a specific clinical condition, a care episode, or a population. Advanced APMs are a subset of APMs and allow clinics to earn more for taking on some risks related to their patient's outcomes. |
Bundled Payment | Under this payment structure, different healthcare providers who are treating a patient for the same or related conditions are paid an overall sum for taking care of a condition rather than being paid for each treatment, test, or procedure. In doing so, providers are rewarded for coordinating care, preventing complications and errors, and reducing unnecessary or duplicative tests and treatments. |
Shared Savings | The shared savings program facilitates coordination and cooperation among providers to improve the quality of care for Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries and reduce unnecessary costs. Eligible providers, hospitals, and suppliers can participate in the shared savings program by creating or participating in an Accountable Care Organization (ACO). |
Global Capitation | The global capitation system operates on the basis of a network of hospitals and physicians receiving fixed payments on a per-member basis for enrolled health plan members. Generally, providers sign a single contract with a health plan to cover care for members and then determine a method of dividing up the capitated payment among the provider group. |
Value-based care holds great promise but comes with challenges. Moving away from the fee-for-service model entails great overhauls in healthcare IT infrastructure, including information data management protocols and payment models. Here are the biggest challenges that healthcare providers face while transitioning to value-based care:
Value-based care is the shift in healthcare delivery since it strives for putting patients' welfare and good quality care into the forefront. The advantages of this value-based care come with focusing on outcomes, preventive measures, and patient engagement with increased patient outcomes, cost containment, and better patient experience.
The outlook of VBC seems bright, particularly with AI, machine learning, and wearable health technologies. These innovations have enabled providers to be proactive about managing patient health, thus preventing readmissions and driving down healthcare costs.
The latest 2025 projections made by industry experts indicate that more than 75% of healthcare payments will be tied to value-based arrangements. That is, healthcare will take on a population health management approach as these models are continually adopted by healthcare systems, creating sustainable and efficient care models.